Obedience

Responsible AI Statement

Which AI we use, the guardrails around it, and the commitment behind "AI assists, humans author".

Version 1.4 · effective 28 July 2026

Owner
Obedience Global Ltd board
Approved by
Obedience Global Ltd board
Approval date
28 July 2026
Next review
28 October 2026
Download versioned PDF

01The commitment

AI assists, humans author. Our AI drafts, suggests and searches. It never signs, never overrides a professional, and never issues anything client-facing on its own. Every AI output in our products shows its source and requires a named person's review and acceptance.

02The models we use

The current public assistants use Anthropic through its commercial API for low-sensitivity product and policy questions. Quantify contains optional Anthropic and OpenAI integration code, but OpenAI private processing and confidential hosted-model processing are not approved current paths. A credential, dependency or feature flag is not approval.

By default, commercial API providers do not use commercial API inputs or outputs to train their models. Standard API content or abuse-monitoring retention can be up to 30 days. Provider legal and safety exceptions may retain limited flagged records for longer, and endpoint-specific application state can have a different lifecycle. Current provider, approval and endpoint controls are recorded in our Data Retention Schedule and Service Provider and Subprocessor List.

03Guardrails in the product

  • Human review is a workflow step, not an option: unreviewed output cannot be issued as final
  • AI suggestions cite the source they were derived from (your data, standards structures, your rate history)
  • AI features degrade safely: if a response is truncated, refused or malformed, the product shows nothing rather than something wrong
  • Capabilities are labelled honestly: Live, In development, or Roadmap, on the product pages and in the app

04Limitations, stated plainly

AI can be wrong, incomplete, or plausible-but-mistaken. That is exactly why the human sign-off step exists and why the Professional Use & Reliance Statement is part of our terms. Treat every AI output as a draft for professional judgement.

05Contestability and change

If an AI feature behaves in a way you think is wrong or unfair, tell us: hello@obedience.global. We log, investigate and answer. When we change the models or providers behind a feature, we record it in the policy changelog. This statement will be updated as the ICO's statutory Code of Practice on AI and automated decision-making is finalised.